CCDB → Angiosperms → Rubiaceae → Hamelia → Hamelia patens Jacq.
| Name | Accepted Name | Gametophytic(n) | Sporophytic(2n) | Data Source | reference | ||
| Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 24 | IPCN online | Dutta, M. 1985. Karyomorphological study of three species of Rubiaceae. Proc. Indian Sci. Congr. Assoc. 72(3–VI): 125. | |||
| Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 24 | IPCN online | Selvaraj, R. 1987. Karyomorphological studies in south Indian Rubiaceae. Cytologia 52: 343–356. | |||
| Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 12II | IPCN online | Philip, K. O. & P. M. Mathew. 1988. Cytology of the south Indian Rubiaceae and its bearing on the evolution and systematics of the family. Glimpses Pl. Res. 8: 177–244. | |||
| Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 12 | IPCN online | Bedi, Y. S., S. S. Bir & B. S. Gill. 1981a. Cytopalynology of woody taxa of family Rubiaceae from north and central India. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., B 47: 708–715. | |||
| Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 12 | IPCN75-78 | Sarker et al. 1975 | |||
| ! | Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 24 | IPCN73-74 | FRITSCH, R. 1970. Chromosomenzahlen von Pflanzen der Insel Kuba. I. Kulturpflanze 18: 189-197. | ||
| Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 24 | Kumar, 1987 | Fagerlind, F. 1937; Ragbavan, T.S. & Rangaswamy, K. 1941 ; Lewis, W .H. 1962b ; Von Reinhard, F. 1970 ; Majumdar, L. 1971 ; Sarkar, A.K., Datta N. & Chatterjee, U. 1975 | |||
| Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 24 | Fedorov, 1974 | Fagerlind 1937 | |||
| Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 24 | Fedorov, 1974 | Raghavan T. S., Rangaswamy 1941 | |||
| Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 24 | Fedorov, 1974 | Lewis W. H. 1962c | |||
| ! | Hamelia patens Jacq. | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 24 | Darlington, 1955 | Fagerlind 1937 | ||
| Hamelia patens var. patens | Hamelia patens Jacq. | 24 | C-values database | Kiehn M. 1986. Karyosystematische Untersuchungen und DNA-Messungen an Rubiaceae und ihre Bedeutung für die Systematik dieser Familie. Ph. D. Thesis. Universität Wien. |